serendipity – noun - the lucky tendency to find interesting or valuable things by chance.
I really felt this blog was leading the zeitgeist last week, when serendipity became Manchester’s ‘word of the week’.
On Tuesday, Malcolm Gladwell was at the Lowry promoting his new book “What the dog saw”.
He talked about three different types of serendipity:
• Columbian serendipity
• Archimedean serendipity
• Galilean serendipity
I know some of my friends really loved the show, but I have mixed feelings, some of which are echoed in this blog review from Edinburgh (different place, same show it seems) and in this post from my co-conspirator Michael Taylor here.
I was more inspired by the ‘Serendipity City Challenge’ discussions at FutureEverything yesterday. As part of the British Council funded ‘GloNet 2010’ project, Manchester innovators were posted around the Globe to work with thinkers and creatives in Sendai, Istanbul, Sao Paulo and Vancouver. Each group prepared a response to the observation from (brilliant) Adam Greenfield that the edge and haphazard character of the city risks being lost in the networked city of tomorrow.
Jon Grant, told us from Sendai, that “there is no creativity without serendipity” and that technology can improve the quality of an encounter, and so improve the output from creative industry.
Does social media encourage you to speak only to like minds, or people within your ‘tribe’ – or does it support broadening of horizons? Can digital networks provide a short cut to face to face, serendipitous meetings at talks and events? What is the role of place and transport in serendipity? These were the challenges set by Drew Hemment, Festival Director, but what do you think?








